Cognitive Model of Reading Assessment, First Proposed by Stephen Stahl
���������:
�����������-(3434)����������-(809)��������-(7483)�������������-(1457)������� ����-(14632)������� ����������-(1363)���������-(913)��������-(1438)�����������-(451)����������-(1065)���-(47672)������������ � ���-(912)����������������-(14524)����������� �����-(4268)�����������-(17799)���������-(1338)�������-(13644)����������-(11121)���������-(55)���������-(373)��������-(8427)�����������-(374)����������-(1642)���������-(23702)����������-(16968)��������������-(1700)��������-(12668)����������-(24684)��������-(15423)������������-(506)�����������-(11852)������ �����-(3308)����������-(5571)����������-(1312)��������-(7869)�����-(5454)���������������-(1369)����������������-(2801)������������-(97182)��������������-(8706)����������-(18388)�������-(3217)�����-(10668)�������� ���������-(299)����������-(6455)�����-(42831)�������������-(4793)��������-(5050)���������-(2929)������-(1568)������-(3942)���������-(17015)�������-(26596)�����-(22929)��������-(12095)���������-(9961)�����������-(8441)��������������-(4623)����������-(12629)�������������-(1492)������� �������-(1748)
Cerebral Linguistics
1. Cerebral linguistics
2. The main concepts of cognitive linguistics
Cognitive linguistics is an approach to the report of language which is based upon homo perception and conceptualization of the world. In other words, it studies the ways in which linguistic units and structures reflect the fashion in which man beings perceive, categorize and conceptualize the world.
Cognitive linguistics is a considerably new approach to linguistic communication analysis. Information technology introduces a fundamentally different conception of language structure, linguistic investigation and the mode of language clarification. The primal claim of cognitive linguistics is that grammar forms a continuum with lexicon and can exist described in terms of symbolic units. Thus, cognitive linguistics, or cognitive grammer, as information technology is often called, focuses on pregnant and explains information technology past the fact that linguistic communication every bit an integral part of homo cognition is symbolic in its nature, and accordingly, it makes bachelor to the speaker an open up-ended set of linguistic signs or expressions, each of which associates a semantic representation of some kind with a phonological representation. From the symbolic nature language follows the centrality of meaning � pregnant is what language all well-nigh. As any linguistic structure is treated as a straight reflex of cognition, information technology follows that a particular linguistic expression is associated with particular mode of conceptualizing a given situation. This leads to a quite different view between language and cognition in general: universal principles governing the pattern of all languages are rooted in knowledge.
The idea that linguistic expressions reflect a item way of perceiving the world got its systemic description by the American language analyst Ronald W. Langacker, professor of linguistics at the University of California, San Diego, in his book published in 1987 �Foundations of Cognitive Grammar�. in this book he proves that grammar is not autonomous with respect to semantics but rather reduces to patterns for the structuring and symbolization of conceptual content. R.Westward. Langacker offered Cognitive Grammar every bit an alternative to the generative tradition. The linguist rejected many of its underlying assumptions thus opposing his theory of language to Chomsky�s theory in which grammar is considered to found autonomous formal level of presentation.
Basic concepts of Cognitive linguistics are normally described with the notions of �construal�, �perspective�, �foregrounding�, �highlighting�, �framing� and �metaphor�. In interaction with each other, these notions have implications for an agreement of the nature of communication. In particular, they suggest that pregnant is non a belongings of utterances just a product of the interaction betwixt an utterance and a human beingness�south cognition base.
The notion of �construal�
In that location is a long tradition in linguistics to believe that the role of language is to map elements of the external world onto linguistic course. According to this view, situations tin can be dissected into a number of component parts, each of which corresponds to some element of language. In contrast, cognitive linguists argue that there is no such direct mapping, a item situation can be �construed� in different ways, and that unlike means for encoding a state of affairs found different conceptualizations, e.g.
(1) John gave the book to Betsy.
(two) John gave Betsy the book.
The traditional view is that these sentences limited the same significant and the syntactic difference has no correspondence in semantics. Nonetheless, in some cases only 1 of these constructions is natural, e.g. we can say �John gave the contend a new coat of paint� but it would be odd to say �John gave a new coat of pigment to the debate�. Conversely, whereas �He brought the apples to the table is fine�, the judgement �He brought the table the apples� is strange. These two differences suggest that the two constructions illustrated in (1) and (2) involve different ways of construing �the same situation� and that in certain cases only one mode of construal is appropriate or natural.
The notion of �perspective�
I factor involved in alternative construals has to exercise with perspective.
(three) The path falls sleeply into the valley.
(4) The path climbs sleeply out of the valley.
Although these sentences could be used to depict the same scene, it is impossible to say that they accept the aforementioned meaning. The difference between them lies in perspective. In (3) the viewpoint is that someone I looking down into the valley, whereas in (4) it is of someone looking upward from the valley floor. The actual position of the speaker in this instance is irrelevant. One does not accept to be looking down to say (3), nor is one necessarily looking up when uttering (4); one might be looking at a painting, viewing the scene sideways-on.
As a second instance, consider the contrast between (5) and (6):
(5) John bought the machine from Betsy.
(6) Betsy sold the car to John.
Hither we have a pair of sentences which refer �the same effect� simply they could hardly be said to express the same meaning. Again the contrast has to do with perspective: sentence (v) construes the situation from John�southward signal of view, whereas (half-dozen) is an expression of Betsy�s viewpoint.
In many cases pragmatic factors influence the choice of the reference betoken and position of the object.
The notion of �foregrounding�
A 2nd factor involved in contrasting construals has to do with the relative prominence of the diverse components of the state of affairs, in other words, this term means that certain elements in discourse are more than prominent than the others. Foregrounding is partly a role linguistic patterning and partly a matter of perception. For example, suppose when somebody is mowing the lawn, one of the blades strokes strikes a rock, causing it to fly into the air and pause a window. This upshot can be reported:
(1) I�ve broken the window.
(two) A stone has broken the window.
These codings involve different construals. (1) foregrounds the speaker�s role in the result, whereas (ii) foregrounds that of the stone, thereby backgrounding the speacker�s involvement in the event.
(3) You won�t be able to open this door with that key.
(4) The fundamental won�t open this door.
Either of these examples could be used in a situation where the leaseholder is almost to attempt to open a door with a particular key, but (3) gives greater prominence to the involvement of the addressee that does (4).
Perspective and foregrounding connect linguistic coding closely to visual perception. But as a item construal of a state of affairs highlights certain elements in a scene and backgrounds others, so the process of visual perception involves focusing on certain elements and relegating others to the periphery of our visual field. In other words, the entity from whose perspective we view a situation is oft also the most salient participant.
The notion of �metaphor�
The concept of construal is closely clinked with another important feature of Cognitive linguistics that differentiates information technology from other theories of language � namely, a concern with metaphor. Metaphor used to be thought of equally a special device characteristic of the literary language. The literary utilize of metaphors is ancient and well studied, and the fields of rhetoric and literary criticism have developed a formidable battery of Greek terms in naming different kinds of metaphor. But metaphors are commonplace in ordinary spoken language and writing: we speak of the foot of a mountain, the center of a needle and so on. Whatsoever language is full of thousands of metaphors and virtually of them are so familiar that language users no longer fifty-fifty regard them every bit metaphorical in nature. Metaphors are a commonplace mode of extending the expressive resources of a language.
In cognitive linguistics a metaphor is understood as a not-literary use of a linguistic form, designed to draw attention to a perceived resemblance. It is a fundamental property of everyday use of linguistic communication and is linked to the notion of construal considering different ways of thinking almost a particular miracle (that is a dissimilar construal of that miracle) are associated with different metaphors. A metaphor can be defined as a device that involves conceptualizing one domain of experience in terms of some other. For case, agreement or not agreement an argument may be construed equally following someone: I don�t follow you; You lot�ve lost me; I am not with y'all. Alternatively, information technology can be thought in terms of seeing: I don�t see what y'all are getting at; Your explanation is not clear; Information technology was really obscure lecture.
A cognitive metaphor serves as mental mapping between two domains: a domain of familiar meanings and a domain of the new pregnant. Therefore, for any given metaphor we tin identify a source domain and a target domain. Source domains tend to be relatively physical areas of experience while target domains are more abstract, e.m. He�south a actually cold person and She gave united states of america a warm welcome the source domain is the scene of touch and the target domain is the more abstract concept of intimacy.
Metaphors involve not but means of thinking about phenomena but likewise ways of thinking about them. In some cases this can have pregnant social implications: investigations of the twentyth c. propose that different modes of discourse were employed at unlike times to brand nuclear weapons palatable to the public. Office of this process involves the names that were applied to such weapons. In the early days of intercontinental ballistic missiles names, such as Jupiter, Titan, Zeus and Atlant were used. This process is metaphorical in that information technology invokes all the connotations of the source domain of classical mythology.
In some cases metaphors are large-scale structures that influence our thinking about the whole areas of human being experience. Metaphor is in fact a prime manifestation of the cognitive claim that language and thought are inextricably intertwined.
In cognitive linguistics frame is defined every bit a set of noesis that are used to provide interpretive information about a linguistic communication unit. The concept of frame as understood by cognitive linguistics can exist best illustrated by example. If one were asked by a non-native speaker of English language what the give-and-take wicket meant, ane might consult a dictionary for help. The Concise Oxford Dictionary gives the following definition of the give-and-take: �one gear up of three stumps and ii bails�. But how much would this mean to a not-native speaker of English language who knew cypher of cricket?
If 1 were asked to explain the pregnant of the discussion wicket, information technology would be natural to say not only what a wicket is but also something well-nigh its overall office in the game. The explanation could be pretty long equally it involve a lot of details. In other words, a expert understanding of the discussion wicket requires a significant corporeality of knowledge that extends well beyond the dictionary definition. Nosotros refer to this background knowledge as the �frame�.
The frame is not itself what is generally idea of equally �the pregnant� of a word merely information technology is nevertheless crucial to an understanding of information technology.
Everything that a speaker knows about the world is a potential part of the frame for a item term, fifty-fifty though some aspects of that knowledge base are more immediately relevant to a item term than others.
The notion of frame has both a conceptual and a cultural dimension. An understanding of the word weekend, for case, involves cognition that it refers to the days that we call Sabbatum and Dominicus rather than to the days that nosotros call, e.1000. Monday and Tuesday. In other terms, this term profiles a certain office of the vii-day cycle. This could be regarded as a conceptual cognition. Merely that knowledge is overlaid with other aspects of noesis that are too the part of the frame: Saturday and Dominicus accept a special condition every bit non-working days for the almost of people in our culture. In other words, part of the knowledge base for weekend involves an understanding of certain specific cultural patterns.
This ways that the concept of frame embraces the traditional concept of �connotation�. For many people the word weekend conjures upwards pleasant images of relaxation, sport, trips to the embankment, and and then on, simply as a term female parent conjures upward images of warmth, affection, and care.
The concept of frame also has implications for language change. When new frames arise, existing words are oft carried over into the new domain, thereby undergoing some alter of pregnant. Most of the terminology that relates to the aircraft and air travel is derived from the nautical domain. The procedure of entering the aeroplane is chosen �boarding�, the main passenger area is called the main �deck�, and the kitchen is chosen the �galley�. In some cases the nature of the referent is dissimilar from the corresponding entity in the source domain (e.g., the deck), and so that there is a pregnant shift in meaning.
Appearance of new words can sometimes be explained in terms of the frame shift. Some creative moves accept both a cerebral and a linguistic dimension. The give-and-take workaholic, which has entered the language relatively recently. Clearly, at that place must have been an occasion on which a particular private produced this word for the showtime fourth dimension. It was motivated by the perception of similarities between habit to alcohol and �addiction� to work. This was a creative event since in many respects working hard and drinking heavily are activities that take very little in common. Working hard is generally perceived as socially virtuous, while drinking heavily is non. Normally, therefore, information technology is a compliment to describe someone as a �hard worker� but not to phone call them �a heavy drinker�.
���� ����������: 2014-01-11; ����������: 5491; ��������� ��������� ����?; �� ������� � ��������� ����� ������!
������������� ��������:
������� �����:
- Construals or cerebral operations
- Lexicology equally a branch of Linguistics
- Lexicology equally a branch of linguistics.
- Linguistic world image, semantic fields, psycho-linguistics, linguistic personality
- Semasiology as a Co-operative of Linguistics
- THE OBJECT OF LEXICOLOGY. LINKS OF LEXICOLOGY WITH OTHER BRANCHES OF LINGUISTICS
Source: https://studopedia.su/10_45982_Cognitive-Linguistics.html
إرسال تعليق for "Cognitive Model of Reading Assessment, First Proposed by Stephen Stahl"